30 2 0 0 9 A N N U A L R E P O R T
FACILITY CHARACTERISTICS
Institutions 1 (continued)
Southern Illinois ATC 8 Jackson 1970 male 56 $1,728.0 61 $28,328
Southwestern Illinois CC multi 672 $30,308.7 674 $44,968
Level 6 facility 6 St. Clair 1995 male 605
Work Camp (Southwestern Illinois) 7 St. Clair 1995 male 67
Stateville CC multi 3,518 $118,322.9 3,394 $34,862
Level 1 facility 1 Will 1925 male 1,617
Reception & Classification Center 1 Will 2004 male 1,760
Minimum-Security Unit (Stateville) 7 Will 2003 male 141
Tamms CC multi 417 $28,669.7 415 $69,084
Closed Maximum-Security Unit 1 Alexander 1998 male 243
Minimum-Security Unit (Tamms) 7 Alexander 1995 male 174
Taylorville CC 5 Christian 1990 male 1,201 $25,363.2 1,177 $21,549
Thomson CC multi 170 $9,546.3 139 $68,678
Level 1 facility 1 Carroll N/A male 0
Minimum-Security Unit (Thomson) 7 Carroll 2006 male 170
Vandalia CC multi 1,538 $34,382.0 1,520 $22,620
Level 6 facility 6 Fayette 1921 male 1,143
Work Camp (Vandalia) 7 Fayette 1996 male 395
Vienna CC multi 1,590 $34,040.5 1,573 $21,640
Level 6 facility 6 Johnson 1965 male 1,374
Impact Incarceration Program (Dixon Springs) 7 Pope 1990 male 204
Impact Incarceration Program (Dixon Springs) 7 Pope 1990 female 12
Western Illinois CC multi 1,975 $37,437.3 2,003 $18,691
Level 2 facility 2 Brown 1989 male 1,872
Work Camp (Clayton) 7 Adams 1993 male 103
West Side ATC 8 Cook 1993 male 113 $4,369.0 110 $39,718
INSTITUTION TOTALS 45,510 $1,133,334.1 45,518 $24,899
DEPARTMENT TOTALS (including Federal, Other 45,545 45,551
State s inmates, Women s Treatment Center)
Security
Level
County
Year
Opened
Gender
June 30, 2009
Population
FY09 Expenditures
(in thousands)2
Average Daily
FY09 Population
Per Capita 3
1 Historical intra-institution comparisons are affected by how the funtional use of the institution has changed over
time (i.e., security level is different, population may have housed juveniles or a different gender, primary role of the
facility regarding program services has been altered, etc.)
2 Expenditures among satellite facilities cannot be extracted from parent facilities for a host of reasons as administra-tive,
dietary, medical, staffing, services costs, etc. are shared. Also, the expenditures here only include correctional
facilities; some expenditures such as parole, general office, shared services, etc. are not included. The FY09 General
Revenue Fund expenditures for the Department of Corrections were $1,308,086,745.
3 Per capita costs are calculated as expenditures divided by average daily population. For the same reasons listed in
footnote #1, the historical intra- and inter-institution comparisons are affected. Further, per capita costs are a
function of economies of scale which further limits an objective comparison between correctional sites; especially
higher security level sites or sites with a small number of inmates.
