(Continued on Next Page)
Based on the facts and exhibits presented, the Property Tax
Appeal Board hereby finds no change in the assessment of the
property as established by the Cook County Board of Review is
warranted. The correct assessed valuation of the property is:
LAND: $ 5,079
IMPR.: $ 21,171
TOTAL: $ 26,250
Subject only to the State multiplier as applicable.
PTAB/BRW/Jun.08/06-20290
1 of 4
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BOARD'S DECISION
APPELLANT: Rose Adamczyk
DOCKET NO.: 06-20290.001-R-1
PARCEL NO.: 10-24-419-024-0000
The parties of record before the Property Tax Appeal Board are
Rose Adamczyk, the appellant, by attorney Julie Realmuto of
McCarthy & Duffy, P.C., Chicago, Illinois; and the Cook County
Board of Review.
The subject property is an 82-year old, one-story style dwelling
of masonry construction containing 1,140 square feet of living
area with a full, unfinished basement.
The appellant’s appeal is based on unequal treatment in the
assessment process. The appellant submitted for consideration
three comparable properties described as one-story frame or
masonry dwellings that are either 57 or 84 years old. The
comparables contain from 1,151 to 1,359 square feet of living
area and have improvement assessments ranging from $11.99 to
$16.50 per square foot. The subject’s improvement assessment is
$18.57 per square foot. Based on this evidence, the appellant
requested a reduction in the subject's improvement assessment.
The board of review submitted its "Board of Review Notes on
Appeal" wherein the subject's final assessment was disclosed.
The board of review presented four comparable properties
consisting of one-story masonry dwellings that are between 76 and
82 years old. Each comparable has a full basement, either
finished or unfinished. The dwellings contain from 1,115 to
1,146 square feet of living area and have improvement assessments
ranging from $18.35 to $19.87 per square foot. Based on this
evidence, the board of review requested confirmation of the
subject's assessment.
After reviewing the record and considering the evidence, the
Property Tax Appeal Board finds that it has jurisdiction over the
