Property Tax Appeal Board Decision 2004-23709-R-1 Lattas

              (Continued on Next Page)
Based on the facts and exhibits presented, the Property Tax
Appeal Board hereby finds no change in the assessment of the
property as established by the Cook County Board of Review is
warranted. The correct assessed valuation of the property is:
LAND: $ 7,680
IMPR.: $ 56,323
TOTAL: $ 64,003
Subject only to the State multiplier as applicable.
PTAB/lbs/070487
1 of 3
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BOARD'S DECISION
APPELLANT: Robert D. Lattas
DOCKET NO.: 04-23709.001-R-1
PARCEL NO.: 14-20-322-009-0000
The parties of record before the Property Tax Appeal Board are
Robert D. Lattas, the appellant, by attorney Terrence Kennedy,
Jr. of Chicago and the Cook County Board of Review.
The subject property consists of a 125-year-old, two-story style
multi-family dwelling of frame construction containing 2,960
square feet of living area and located in Lake View Township,
Cook County. The subject improvement features four living units,
four baths and a full basement.
The property in this appeal was the subject of an appeal before
the Property Tax Appeal Board for the prior year under Docket
No. 03-25709.001-R-1. In that appeal, the Property Tax Appeal
Board reached a decision based upon equity and the weight of the
evidence in the record as presented by the parties to the appeal.
Pursuant to the Official Rules of the Property Tax Appeal Board,
evidence from both parties in support of their respective
opinions of the subject's market value as of the assessment date
or equity of the assessment was requested.
After reviewing the record and considering the evidence, the
Property Tax Appeal Board finds that it has jurisdiction over the
parties and the subject matter of this appeal. The Property Tax
Appeal Board finds from its analysis of the record that the
evidence in this appeal is no different from that of the prior
year. Since no new evidence was presented to warrant a change
from the previous year's decision, the Board finds that the
assessment as established in the prior year's appeal is
appropriate.