Property Tax Appeal Board Decision 2005-24669-R-1 Kerkstra

              (Continued on Next Page)
Based on the facts and exhibits presented, the Property Tax
Appeal Board hereby finds no change in the assessment of the
property as established by the COOK County Board of Review is
warranted. The correct assessed valuation of the property is:
LAND: $ 3,369
IMPR. $35,574
TOTAL: $38,943
Subject only to the State multiplier as applicable.
PTAB/TMcG.
1 of 3
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BOARD'S DECISION
APPELLANT: Jeanne Kerkstra
DOCKET NO.: 05-24669.001-R-1
PARCEL NO.: 17-17-409-028-0000
The parties of record before the Property Tax Appeal Board are
Jeanne Kerkstra, the appellant, by attorney Adam E. Bossov of
Chicago and the Cook County Board of Review.
The subject property consists of a 101-year-old, three-story,
three-unit apartment building of masonry construction containing
3,480 square feet of living area and located in West Township,
Cook County. The apartment property includes three bathrooms, a
full basement and a two-car garage. The property in this appeal
was the subject of an appeal before the Property Tax Appeal Board
for the prior year under Dockets No. 03-30293-R-1 and 04-26033-R-
1. In that appeal, the Property Tax Appeal Board reached a
decision based upon equity and the weight of the evidence in the
record as presented by the parties to the appeal. Pursuant to
the Official Rules of the Property Tax Appeal Board, evidence
from both parties in support of their respective opinions of the
subject's market value as of the assessment date or equity of the
assessment was requested.
After reviewing the record and considering the evidence, the
Property Tax Appeal Board finds that it has jurisdiction over the
parties and the subject matter of this appeal. The Property Tax
Appeal Board finds from its analysis of the record that the
evidence in this appeal is no different from that of the prior
year. Since no new evidence was presented to warrant a change
from the previous year's decision, the Board finds that the
assessment as established in the prior year's appeal is
appropriate.