Property Tax Appeal Board Decision 2005-21791-R-1 Barnett

              (Continued on Next Page)
Based on the facts and exhibits presented, the Property Tax
Appeal Board hereby finds no change in the assessment of the
property as established by the COOK County Board of Review is
warranted. The correct assessed valuation of the property is:
LAND: $ 3,896
IMPR. $37,025
TOTAL: $40,921
Subject only to the State multiplier as applicable.
PTAB/TMcG.
1 of 4
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BOARD'S DECISION
APPELLANT: Lee Barnett
DOCKET NO.: 05-21791.001-R-1
PARCEL NO.: 14-17-309-045-0000
The parties of record before the Property Tax Appeal Board (PTAB)
are Lee Barnett, the appellant, by attorney Adam E. Bossov, P.C.
of Chicago and the Cook County Board of Review (board).
The subject property consists of a 113-year-old, two-story multi-family,
dwelling of frame construction containing 2,360 square
feet of living area and located in Lakeview Township, Cook
County. The residence contains two bathrooms and a full
basement. The property in this appeal was the subject of an
appeal before the Property Tax Appeal Board for the prior year
under Docket Nos. 03-26097-R-1 and 04-23913-R-1. In that appeal,
the Property Tax Appeal Board reached a decision based upon
equity and the weight of the evidence in the record as presented
by the parties to the appeal. Pursuant to the Official Rules of
the Property Tax Appeal Board, evidence from both parties in
support of their respective opinions of the subject's market
value as of the assessment date or equity of the assessment was
requested.
After reviewing the record and considering the evidence, the
Property Tax Appeal Board finds that it has jurisdiction over the
parties and the subject matter of this appeal. The Property Tax
Appeal Board finds from its analysis of the record that the
evidence in this appeal is no different from that of the prior
year. Since no new evidence was presented to warrant a change
from the previous year's decision, the Board finds that the
assessment as established in the prior year's appeal is
appropriate.