Property Tax Appeal Board Decision 2005-21744-R-1 Goldberg

              (Continued on Next Page)
Based on the facts and exhibits presented, the Property Tax
Appeal Board hereby finds a reduction in the assessment of the
property as established by the Cook County Board of Review is
warranted. The correct assessed valuation of the property is:
DOCKET NO. PARCEL NO. LAND IMPR. TOTAL
05-21744.001-R-1 10-07-408-003-0000 $25,862 $79,000 $104,862
05-21744.002-R-1 10-08-300-003-0000 $ 6,533 $ -0- $ 6,533
Subject only to the State multiplier as applicable.
PTAB/lbs/08
1 of 4
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BOARD'S DECISION
APPELLANT: Andy Goldberg
DOCKET NO.: 05-21744.001-R-1 and 05-21744.002-R-1
PARCEL NO.: See below
The parties of record before the Property Tax Appeal Board are
Andy Goldberg, the appellant, by attorney Joanne Elliott of
Elliott & Associates, , and the Cook County Board of Review.
The subject property consists of a The subject property consists
of a 90-year-old, one and one-half story style single-family
dwelling of stucco construction containing 6,057 square feet of
living area and located in Niles Township, Cook County.
Amenities include four full baths, two half-baths, a full
basement, air conditioning, three fireplaces and a three and one-half
car garage.
The property in this appeal was the subject of an appeal before
the Property Tax Appeal Board for the prior year under Docket
No. 04-21660.001-R-1 and 04-21660.002-R-1. In that appeal, the
Property Tax Appeal Board reached a decision based upon equity
and the weight of the evidence in the record as presented by the
parties to the appeal. Pursuant to the Official Rules of the
Property Tax Appeal Board, evidence from both parties in support
of their respective opinions of the subject's market value as of
the assessment date or equity of the assessment was requested.
After reviewing the record and considering the evidence, the
Property Tax Appeal Board finds that it has jurisdiction over the
parties and the subject matter of this appeal. The Property Tax
Appeal Board finds from its analysis of the record that the
evidence in this appeal is no different from that of the prior
year. Since no new evidence was presented to warrant a change
from the previous year's decision, the Board finds that the
assessment as established in the prior year's appeal is
appropriate.