(Continued on Next Page)
Based on the facts and exhibits presented, the Property Tax
Appeal Board hereby finds a reduction in the assessment of the
property as established by the Cook County Board of Review is
warranted. The correct assessed valuation of the property is:
Docket No. Parcel No. Land Impr. Total
05-22876.001-C-1 28-35-302-008-0000 $41,490 $310 $41,800
05-22876.002-C-1 28-35-302-009-0000 $41,490 $310 $41,800
Subject only to the State multiplier as applicable.
1 of 4
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BOARD'S DECISION
APPELLANT: Ron Janda
DOCKET NO.: 05-22876.001-C-1 & 05-22876.002-C-1
PARCEL NO.: 28-35-302-008-0000 & 28-35-302-009-0000
The parties of record before the Property Tax Appeal Board are
Ron Janda, the appellant, by attorney Arnold G. Siegel of
Chicago; and the Cook County Board of Review.
The subject property is improved with an 18 year old, one-story
masonry constructed commercial building containing 4,446 square
feet of building area. The building is used as a self-service
car wash. The improvements are located on a 56,106 square foot
site in Country Club Hills, Bremen Township, Cook County.
The appellant contends the market value of the subject property
is not accurately reflected in its assessed valuation. In
support of this overvaluation argument the appellant submitted
an appraisal estimating the subject property had a market value
of $220,000 as of January 1, 2005. The appellant also submitted
a copy of the final decision issued by the Cook County Board of
Review establishing a total assessment for the subject of
$99,997, which reflects a market value of $263,150 using the
Cook County Real Property Assessment Classification Ordinance
level of assessments for class 5A property of 38%. Based on
this evidence the appellant requested the subject's assessment
be reduced to reflect the appraised value.
The board of review did not submit its "Board of Review Notes on
Appeal" or any evidence in support of its assessed valuation of
the subject property.
After reviewing the record and considering the evidence, the
Property Tax Appeal Board finds that it has jurisdiction over