Property Tax Appeal Board Decision 2005-22578-R-1 Holloway

              (Continued on Next Page)
Based on the facts and exhibits presented, the Property Tax
Appeal Board hereby finds no change in the assessment of the
property as established by the Cook County Board of Review is
warranted. The correct assessed valuation of the property is:
LAND: $ 9,218
IMPR.: $ 38,975
TOTAL: $ 48,193
Subject only to the State multiplier as applicable.
PTAB/rfd5486
1 of 4
PROPERTY TAX APPEAL BOARD'S DECISION
APPELLANT: B. Holloway
DOCKET NO.: 05-22578.001-R-1
PARCEL NO.: 04-33-218-030-0000
The parties of record before the Property Tax Appeal Board are
B. Holloway, the appellant, by attorney Mary T. Nicolau with the
law firm of Smith Kruse & Nicolau in Lincolnwood, and the Cook
County Board of Review.
The subject property consists of a 27-year-old, two-story,
single-family dwelling of frame construction containing 2,286
square feet of living area and located in Northfield Township,
Cook County. Features of the home include two and one-half
bathrooms, a full-unfinished basement, air-conditioning, a
fireplace and a two-car attached garage.
The property in this appeal was the subject of an appeal before
the Property Tax Appeal Board for the prior year under Docket
No. 04-24748.001-R-1. In that appeal, the Property Tax Appeal
Board reached a decision based upon equity and the weight of the
evidence in the record as presented by the parties to the appeal.
Pursuant to the Official Rules of the Property Tax Appeal Board,
evidence from both parties in support of their respective
opinions of the subject's market value as of the assessment date
or equity of the assessment was requested.
After reviewing the record and considering the evidence, the
Property Tax Appeal Board finds that it has jurisdiction over the
parties and the subject matter of this appeal. The Property Tax
Appeal Board finds from its analysis of the record that the
evidence in this appeal is substantially the same as that of the
prior year. Since no new evidence was presented to warrant a
change from the previous year's decision, the Board finds that